La Vie Quotidienne

August 23, 2007

The name game or gaming naming…

Filed under: general, society, trends — Shefaly @ 2:43 pm
Tags: , , , , ,

What a wonderful thing a name is! We are stuck with it, more or less, for life, and yet we rarely have any control over its choice.

We cannot choose our parents so we are sort of given the family name or second name, and of course the first name can hardly be chosen by us when we are barely out of our shrink-wrap. In India, the baby is not named immediately upon birth or before checking out of the hospital, but on a special ‘auspicious’ day picked by the family pandit, who also advises people on the letters they can and cannot use for names. But since all this happens within weeks of the birth, it is hardly any consolation.

There are exceptions of course. Penelope Trunk, the blogger and writer, was apparently born Adrienne. Another Indian friend was so fed up with her siblings pulling her leg that in high school, she went and changed her name to something wholly unrelated to her original name. Yet another friend in the UK only goes by a shortened version of her old-fashioned yet charming English name and a surname, which she shares with her son though she has been married and divorced once more after divorcing her son’s father. Another woman in my college in Cambridge took on an altogether different and a rather lovely name with celestial links, but none to her family or given name.

And then there are the interesting practices, such as taking on a new name to make it easy for others to say it. I think one’s name being mispronounced is one of the worst things to experience, right up there with nails screeching down a blackboard.

I have recently gained two new e-contacts, both originally from mainland China. One is a reader and the other a ‘friend’ on one of the more obscure social networking sites that I use, although she too has been reading this blog through somebody’s link-love. It may be time to confess that before this, my only close personal contact with people from China has been with only a few girls, the three with whom I shared my kitchen in Cambridge for a year, of whom one was also my flatmate; my very good lawyer friend in America; and one of my classmates in Cambridge, who was the exception to the ‘rule’ below. I knew some in MIT too but they did not appear to use their Chinese names at all.

What was fascinating about all of them was their anglicised names - Amy, Jenny, Wendy, Jane, Teresa, Kate - when their email handles and their formal, full names were lovely Chinese names meaning ‘the sunrise’, ‘little scholar’, ‘the flower’ and so on. My once-removed Chinese contacts have a similar thing going with anglicised first names and Chinese middle-names and family names.

Then there is the cultural practice of using a different name, a very different one from one’s given name. Why, for instance, do Americans call a person called John ‘Jack’? Or why do Bengalis give their children complicated tongue-twister bhaalo-naam (lit. good name), such as Dwaipayan or Aniruddho, only to call them by their completely randomly chosen daak-naam (pet name) such as Gogol or Bubai? And then there are regional and temporal quirks in pet names. An older English person named Richard may be Dick, but nowadays, we best call him Rich. Alexander is Alex in England but Sandy in Scotland. Go figure!

Sometimes one does not choose but gets given a pet name of sorts. See Basab’s post here on his not-so-secret Starbucks name.

Then there is the eternal search for a unique name. Vidya Pradhan has written today about the race for unusual names, preferably one with a unique domain address still available. A few years ago, a pregnant friend of mine was searching for a name for their yet-to-be-born son. In their search, they stumbled upon a lovely name. Alas, it has also conferred upon the child a rather unfortunate set of initials (A R S) which he may never be able to live down completely.

Popular names are the zeitgeist of a nation or a society too. In the UK, biblical names such as David are being relegated to the back-seat in favour of more exotic yet scriptural names like Joshua, while girls are being called Paige and Madison rather than Victoria and Katherine.

In a class-riven society, names could signal a lot more than we think. I do not wish to upset some people I know, so I’d better leave this without examples :-)

Then there are names which travel across cultures and those that do not. John could be Johannes or Juan. Joanna could become Ioanna in Greece. James is Hamish north of the border in the UK. Alice is Alicia in Spain, while Andrew is Andres and Herman is Armando.

And then there are the tongue-twisting Indian names that their western colleagues somehow learn to pronounce and in most cases, pronounce more properly than they may be said in India. They may be difficult to say but nearly always an Indian name has a meaning, rooted in religion, nature, culture, desirable virtues, our vast mythology and our portfolio of ‘Gods’. Too many examples to think of something specific but hey, mine is the name of a small, white flower with an orange stem, which falls off when it is ready - small, perfectly formed, fragrant and deceptively wilful!

Given a full Indian name, and with some general knowledge about India, you can guess almost the entire pedigree of a person: the region he comes from, the state (most of the times), the religion (almost always), the caste. That ‘analysis’ complete and the person firmly ensconced in a slot in the grid of our given social framework, we then proceed to find more about his education, his family, his prospects and finally, we may, if he is lucky, come around to discussing his views and thoughts and ideas. I have a college friend, who gave up her second name altogether to escape such easy ‘classification’. Now of course, she uses her husband’s name as her second name and is back in the surreal realm where people classify and slot you even before they know any more than your name.

A name could be a blessing. Hear the name Alannah Myles and it is easy to imagine an artiste, what with its lilting ‘l’ and musical ‘m’ sounds. A name could also be a curse, as names are sometimes used to discriminate when we apply for jobs, as some studies have shown.

An invented - and inventive - name could be your entire career. Don’t you think Freddie Mercury was a clever clog for swapping his family name Bulsara over for Mercury? Or how boring it might have been for The Police’s front-man to continue calling himself ‘Gordon Sumner’ instead of renaming himself ‘Sting’?

So, why do we have so little control over our names?

Further reading:

Usha on shortening tongue-twisting names

Shreyasi on the story behind her name

Basab on his not-so-secret Starbucks name

Vidya on the race for names and domain names, culturally rooted names, and just oddball names

NY Times article (registration may be required): A Boy Named Sue, and a Theory of Names

15 Comments »

  1. Yes it is worthy of publication and much more.Not only informative but very interesting given the cross cultural references.
    Long back I had written about my travails with my own name, you may find it here (http://shreyasideb.blogspot.com/2007/01/shreyasi-by-whatever-name-you-call-her.html) and have a good laugh over it!

    Comment by S — August 24, 2007 @ 8:42 am

  2. The sweetest sound in any language for any person is the sound of his/her own name. Ask any individual about her name, and she can talk for hours about it. The sheer fact that she didn’t have choice in picking it may or may not matter. Just notice how the few links you included in this post elaborately illustrate this.

    For those who think their name is an unpronounceable liability, there’s always the option of reducing it to a shorter, often “Western” nickname. For others, changing a name is like choosing an avatar; pick the one that you consider the most desirable, and let the world call you by that name. Craft an image around it, and see what happens.

    Would Cary Grant be just as debonair and charming as Archibald Leach?
    Would Woody Allen be just as funny as Allen Koenigsburg?

    Hmm… I don’t know. But then, I’m not a certain 16th-century William despite the mystery behind his authorship. ;-)

    Cheers,
    -a
    PS: good post.

    Comment by Atul — August 27, 2007 @ 7:50 pm

  3. Atul: I know plenty of people who hate their own names, and therefore go by other, adopted names. I know some who, when they grow up, may be forgiven for wanting to change their given names (see example of the child above with initials A R S).

    I think the image of the name has a lot to do with the image of the individual who goes by the name. Which is why people change names. It is hard to sound cool with a 14-syllable, tongue-twister of a name; it is hard to sound exotic if the name is as common as Bob Smith or some such.

    In my reckoning, a ‘Koenigsberg’ (note spelling) is more weighty than Allen for a writer, but perhaps might have been more prone to prejudice, not that he did not flaunt his Jewishness in his work quite enough!

    Alas that Shakespearean line was spoken by Juliet about Romeo, whose being Montague made all the difference in the love story. A Romeo by any other name might just have lived!

    Thanks.

    Comment by Shefaly — August 28, 2007 @ 1:28 pm

  4. And they say whats in a name.. :)
    Name’s the one thing my parents got me right I guess, somehow I like the way it sounds. I have a real big problem with people cutting my name short, I feel its a kind of disrespect to people who named me, but then actual fact is, people I want only few special people in my life to actually have liberty of calling me my nick name.
    As I started to blog, I Didnt have much time to think about a pen name, I zeroed in on Rambler too soon, may be I should have thought about a better one

    Comment by Rambler — August 31, 2007 @ 10:27 am

  5. Rambler: Indeed! But the smell of the rose aside, Shakespeare should have tried calling a rose a ‘cauliflower’ and then watched how many women wanted to adorn their hair with it or how many men willing to give bunches of it.

    Shortening names to me appears a lazy solution, from people who can’t be bothered to try enough.

    I think Rambler is a good handle for writing ramblings, mainly because its meanings allow you plenty of leeway to write.

    Thanks for reading.

    Comment by Shefaly — August 31, 2007 @ 2:27 pm

  6. wow.. beautifully written article

    Comment by Ankur Aggarwal — October 6, 2007 @ 5:16 am

  7. Ankur: Thanks for your note. I am pleased you liked the article.

    Comment by Shefaly — October 6, 2007 @ 6:21 am

  8. Hi Shefaly,

    Near nice write up.

    Voracious Blog Reader

    Comment by Voracious Blog Reader — October 6, 2007 @ 5:35 pm

  9. VBR: Thanks for your note! I think time is ripe for a part deux. In a few days I think.. Thanks.

    Comment by Shefaly — October 6, 2007 @ 5:40 pm

  10. Hey Shefaly,

    After a bit of head scratching after reading your comment, I read mine.

    It should have beenn “REAL nice write up”. Don’t ask me how I wrote the above comment. I am thinking myself. My comment tries to call your write up “fell one shot of super”, which wasn’t what I intended to say.

    Voracious Blog Reader

    Comment by Voracious Blog Reader — October 6, 2007 @ 6:47 pm

  11. VBR: Thanks. No worries. :-)

    Comment by Shefaly — October 7, 2007 @ 7:23 am

  12. Hiya. Neat writeup. On the matter of names, my parents inflicted a doozy on me: a single name! No surname! This didn’t matter for years until I went to the US. The Visa stamped on my passport said FNU Feanor. First Name Unknown. The next time I went, I was Feanor LNU. You can guess the surname there. When I joined Motorola in Chicago, my boss introduced me as FNU to my colleagues. They took it in their stride until I pointed out that that was a bureaucratic convenience nothing to do with me. Whereupon they paled at the horror of having caused a faux-pas. A nurse at a hospital fell about laughing when I told her I only bore a single-barrelled name. Then she cursed when her computer refused to register me under one name. What would you do if Madonna were here instead of me, I asked. She didn’t condescend to reply. These days nobody bats an eyelid: I have gone and added a surname. Coming from a matriarchal community, it was not so hard to choose. But I am not so special anymore :-)

    Comment by Feanor — December 19, 2007 @ 2:30 pm

  13. @ Feanor: That is a funny story, indeed, one I imagine your future generations will hear too :-)

    I imagine Madonna does not get entered into a system (At any rate, officially, she is Madonna Louise Ciccone, which is how her name appeared outside the Church in Dornoch, where she married Guy Ritchie some years ago. Just in case someone is bothered).

    I have a friend who started out with a single name (I mention her in the post) and has now added her husband’s name to hers, thus beating the logic of oppressive patriarchy she sought to oppose by dropping her father’s surname in the first place.

    This story also reminds me of a real-life story I read in Reader’s Digest as a child. A chap called R B Jones, where R and B were not initials but his entire name, often received letters that said: R(Only) B (Only) Jones until one day when he received a letter addressed to: Ronly Bonly Jones. ;-)

    As for being special, we are all special, just like everyone else. No? My name is special because it does not follow any caste norms but a weird quirk of my family. I intend to keep being special all my life!

    Thanks for your amusing note!

    Comment by Shefaly — December 19, 2007 @ 4:21 pm

  14. [...] — Shefaly @ 6:30 am Tags: career, cultures, Life, names, society, success This post first appeared in August 2007 and generated much discussion. Still does. I thought it will make some interesting [...]

    Pingback by Second outing: The name game or naming gaming « La Vie Quotidienne — December 30, 2007 @ 6:34 am

  15. Very interesting and loved the comments too. Ronly Bonly - hahahha.
    In the State I come from we don’t usually have family names ( except it used to be the caste before) so the father’s first name is the maiden surname ans after marriage this is supplanted by the husband’s firstname. The funny thing about this is that while I share the same surname with my children, my husband’s surname is not the same as mine!

    Comment by usha — March 9, 2008 @ 2:30 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.