Don’t tar the teens
That the web is but a microcosm of the world has been my working hypothesis in the 15 odd years of being online. Whatever happens or occurs in the world is bound to be found on the web. Likewise it is best if we observe the rules of common courtesy that apply in the real world.
The blogosphere however is an evolving universe with its own peculiarities. Is it an agora where dissent is bound to be heard sometime but since it is a public space, one must not, can not control it? Is it a public house or an old time cafe where anyone can speak their mind but the publican can throw you out for being disorderly? Is it one’s drawing room where only a few are invited and the rest are cold-shouldered ? I think for those who use free publishing tools like WordPress, the drawing room analogy definitely does not apply. Inasmuch as people can post rejoinders and opinions and link to the views they disagree with, this is not really a publican controlled space either. That leaves the agora analogy on the table, unless the readers of this blog can come up with more exciting ones.
Whatever analogies we use, words are the currency in the blogosphere. Notwithstanding the old adage about sticks and stones, there are plenty of occasions in the blogosphere where words easily seem to hurt many. Every time, any words I floated into the blogosphere go wrong, i.e. are deemed rude, or are ascribed intent other than intended, I have to wonder if my “the web is a microcosm of the world” hypothesis holds good. But then I stop wondering because just like in the real world, unsubstantiated opinions, prejudices etc also abound on the web.
Yesterday, I came across a post that identified itself as a “thought, not an opinion”. I shall leave aside my struggle with the epistemological difference between a thought and an opinion in a medium where all opinions are allowed and published. (See Disclaimer below.)
The said blogger made a great deal of effort in collating her observations made at Indian teenagers’ blogs. Amongst things that seemed to upset the blogger were teenagers discussing sex and sexuality, complaining about the inanity of parents, making fun of teachers, “bad habits” (the blogger’s description of smoking), suicidal notes, racism and bad language.
The only reason why I thought the post was worth a comment was that I do not stand for wholesale tarnishing of entire groups of people - whether by gender, race, religion or as in this case, age. Nor do I stand for wholesale moralising by the same adults - us - who have set the world to be a place where racism, bullying and other ills exist. I fail to understand why we should be surprised at teenagers being racist or bullies when our daily press and our lives are punctuated by adults engaging in exactly this behaviour in the name of politics, office work and so on.
I left a comment that the blogger deleted, saying it was very rude. Here is the comment to which I have added italics to clarify some points.
Most of us, who wore punk hairstyles and clothes, have grown up to become reasonable adults. Just because they (the teenagers today) do not have a childhood similar to ours does not mean there is anything wrong with them. Any sort of -ism reflected in their writing is something that saw in the world shaped by their adults. Any feelings of despondency, curiosity (sexual or otherwise) and “hard man” acts are all par for the course too.
I have engaged with several teenagers and young adults who looked disruptive and disrespectful to other adults, but who responded well when spoken with, not talked at, when empathised with, not judged, when people saw them as persons at a certain age, not just a member of a tribe of a certain age. We as adults need to know what signals *we* give out as well.
I despair of a world full of adults who have such low opinions of the future generations. Perhaps we need to go and ask our ‘Uncles and Aunties’ what they thought of us when we were teenagers. If they do not lie through their teeth, we may learn a few home truths about ourselves.
So let’s be fair to the youngsters and they will show themselves worthy of the trust we can place in them.
The blogger responded by adding that I was rude and that as a future parent, she feels the challenges faced are very different to those faced by our parents. My next comment is, of course, held in moderation but here it is anyway:
It is your blog so it is your privilege to delete anything you deem rude. My comment was not meant to be and not worded to be rude at all. But since it is no longer here (on your blog), other readers have to go by your assessment of it. Such is life. This is also the reason why I wrote this post because as a blogger, I engage with many extremely smart bloggers, none of whom, with two exceptions including this instance, have had to label me rude or anything else just for dissenting with them. I am vexed by the presumptions of intent although I find it amusing that some people think theirs is the only point of view.
The reason why I said we were also like the current teenagers is simple: unless parents and future parents remember that (their own teenage), they will not understand what goes on in a child’s head. Isn’t this another way to interpret ‘child is the father of man’?
As such the challenges remain the same as our parents’ generation namely how to empathise with your child even when he/she is not talking to you; how to make the children understand - without snooping on their every mood and move - that even if they shun you, you will still be around in case they fall flat on their faces; how to assert parental authority without encountering total rebellion.
I have to laugh as I re-read the post I responded to and my own comment. My friends, who have children, all seriously believe they are the first women to have children. This, in the face of an earth on which over 6 billion walk, suggesting that at least 6 billion children were produced before! Parenting is truly as old as mankind.
It is lame to think that parenting challenges are any different now than they were before. Saying such a thing betrays an inability to conceptualise one of the most important things in life. It also is grist to my notion that few enter parenting with any thought, but plenty of emotion. (Note to parents: save your brickbats. I am inured. My views are expressed as a hyper-cognitive and hyper-analytical person, two traits that most of my regular blog-readers already know. Thanks.) Each generation has to come to grips with some new technology or the other - it would be fun to ask the parents of those, who were teenagers as the pill was being made available on the market - but to suggest, that the web somehow poses a greater danger than ever before, is a tad naive. Why, the web is even a goldmine for those parents, who cannot otherwise deal with a child’s incessant questions and who do not have access to a godmother like me. Ok, that last remark was in jest. I have no more vacancies for god-children.
As I set aside my weekend for my god-son, a profound, sensitive and extremely intelligent child, who has the smartest and most wonderfully engaged mother, all this is food for thought for me. And just for that, I may have to thank the blogger, whom I cite above.
Disclaimer: I am aware that I have not linked to the blogger in question. One reason - no desire to give her either free publicity or more dissent. If you are keen, let me know and I can direct you to the post.
Related reading on parenting:
Alice Bachini-Smith’s down-to-earth posts - Not Mother’s Day, Sensible Parenting #1, The difficulties of growing up.
Paul Graham on Lies we tell kids (long essay!)
















